Supreme Court of India (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

A seven-judge Supreme Court bench closed the two-decade-old N. Ravi reference on legislative privilege and free speech as infructuous on October 6, because the Tamil Nadu Assembly had withdrawn its 2003 resolution, while keeping the constitutional questions open.

The court left open the interplay between Articles 194(3), 19(1)(a) and 21.

Article 194(3) deals with the powers and privileges of State legislatures.

Article 19(1)(a) deals with freedom of speech.

The court has not held that privilege overrides fundamental rights or the reverse.

The questions can be pursued in appropriate future proceedings.

The case is N. Ravi and others v. Speaker, Legislative Assembly, Tamil Nadu, which began in 2003.

In 2003, the Tamil Nadu Assembly took action against journalists, including N. Ravi, over articles in The Hindu and Murasoli about Assembly proceedings.

The Privileges Committee found a possible breach, and the Assembly passed a resolution on November 7, 2003.

The then Speaker, K. Kalimuthu, ordered the journalists’ arrest, and the Supreme Court stayed the arrest of six journalists, according to ThePrint.

A bench of Justices Y.K. Sabharwal and S.B. Sinha stayed the arrests on November 10, 2003, according to LiveLaw.

In December 2003, the court framed substantial questions of law and referred the matter to a five-judge bench.

That bench noted a conflict between earlier rulings on legislative privileges and referred the matter to seven judges.

The reference then remained pending for about two decades, and the court fixed the hearing for October 6 in August 2026.

The Tamil Nadu Assembly had unanimously withdrawn its November 7, 2003 resolution in 2004, according to ThePrint.

Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran told the court about the withdrawal, and the bench noted that the reference order had not taken notice of it.

Because the resolution stood recalled, the court held that there was no surviving cause of action.

The writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.

The bench kept the legal questions open to be pursued in future in appropriate proceedings.

The open questions concern the interplay between Articles 194(3), 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution.

Supreme Court of India (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *