Supreme Court of India (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The Supreme Court said on October 5 that it has not approved any modified Form 6 used to enrol voters during the Special Intensive Revision, and asked the Election Commission to produce records showing who made the changes.

The Election Commission had said the Supreme Court approved the new declaration on Form 6.

Daily Pioneer reported that the commission’s statement came on September 26 and linked the approval to the court’s May 2026 judgment on Bihar’s revision.

On October 5 the Chief Justice said any modified Form 6 had not been approved by the court.

The court has asked the commission to produce records.

The reports did not include a response from the commission.

The Chief Justice said any modified Form 6 had not been approved by the court and that the bench wanted to see who had modified it once the record was produced.

The court issued notice on the petition and ordered the Election Commission to produce the relevant records.

The petition was tagged with related pleas challenging Election Commission decisions, including a public interest litigation filed by a Patna resident on similar grounds.

Form 6 is the form that eligible citizens use to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll.

The disputed change is a new declaration attached to the online Form 6.

It asks applicants to state whether they or their parents were mapped in the previous SIR.

Open magazine reported that the declaration is absent from the forms used in other states.

The Election Commission had said that the Supreme Court approved the new declaration, and Daily Pioneer reported that the commission’s statement came on September 26.

According to Daily Pioneer, the Commission linked the approval to the court’s May 2026 judgment on the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar.

The plea was filed by advocate Shailendra Mani Tripathi and argued by senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, according to Open magazine.

The plea seeks action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and other officials over the changes, according to the same report.

The reports available on October 5 and 6 did not include a response from the Election Commission to the Chief Justice’s remarks.

Supreme Court of India (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *