Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The Supreme Court heard a petition on September 22 challenging notices issued to 33 lakh Delhi voters in the Special Intensive Revision, with advocate Prashant Bhushan arguing the process was opaque; about 47.7 lakh names were removed from the draft roll.

The Supreme Court heard a Delhi SIR case on September 22, with the final electoral roll scheduled for November 4.

Voters have until September 30 to file claims for inclusion in the roll.

About 47.7 lakh names were removed from the draft roll published on August 31.

Around 33 lakh voters have received notices during the revision.

Roughly 97.51 lakh enumeration forms were collected during the process.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the process was opaque.

He said the Election Commission had not disclosed the basis for flagging people as a ‘logical discrepancy’ or ‘unmapped’, either in the notices or on its website.

Bhushan said, in effect, that voters were not being told the specific reason their names were flagged.

The draft electoral roll for Delhi, published on August 31, 2026, removed about 47.7 lakh names from the existing list of roughly 1.45 crore electors.

Officials said around 97.51 lakh enumeration forms were collected or uploaded during the revision process.

The final electoral roll is scheduled to be published on November 4, 2026.

The deadline for filing claims for inclusion in the roll is September 30, 2026.

Special Intensive Revision is a process in which the Election Commission re-verifies the electoral roll, requiring voters to fill in enumeration forms and flagging discrepancies for further checks.

Prominent voters who received notices in the exercise included External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and BJP veteran L K Advani.

The Election Commission has said that receiving a notice does not by itself mean a person’s name will be removed from the roll.

The case is being watched closely because Delhi’s SIR could be a template for similar exercises the Election Commission may carry out in other states.

A Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana agreed to hear the plea on Delhi’s Special Intensive Revision on September 22.

Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *